5 Things to Know About ISIS

AP_ISIS_TG_140620_16x9_992

Is there a difference between ISIS and ISIL?

ISIS is to ISIL as Prince is to “The Artist Formerly Known as Prince.” Translated from Arabic, ISIS stands for The Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (or al-Sham). ISIL translated is an acronym for  The Islamic State of Iraq and Levant. The US State Department officially refers to the terrorist group as ISIL, which is why President Obama uses that name. Most news media outlets like Fox News and MSNBC, refer to the terrorist group as ISIS. Some argue, specifically Chuck Todd of NBC News, that the State Department’s insistence on using ISIL instead of ISIS is to downplay the use of Syria in the name.

“Obviously, we refer to it at NBC News as ISIS,” Todd explains. “The Obama administration, the President says the word ISIL. The last ‘S’ stands for Syria. The last ‘L’ they don’t want to have stand for Syria.”

On the other end of the spectrum, Fox News’ Harris Faulkner argues the reason President Obama says ISIL instead of ISIS is that the use of ‘Levant’ (a geographic region of the eastern Mediterranean, e.g Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, Palestine) refers to a larger area to combat the terrorist group.

“They changed the name in the middle of all this to ISIL. They don’t have the right to do that. We’re going to continue to call them ISIS…So, it’s the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. Levant is a bigger territory. That’s why they want to embrace that name and it includes many, many more countries than just Syria.”

Further complicating matters, ISIS (or ISIL) officially changed its name to ‘The Islamic State’ or IS, when they established a caliphate.

What is caliphate?

A caliphate establishes religious authority over all Muslims. Historically, it is an Islamic state led by a religious or political leader called a caliph. It is ruled by Islamic faithful and adheres to Sharia Law. There have been several caliphates established throughout Islamic history including those of the Umayyads, the Abbasids, and the Ottomans. There are also very different views on the establishment of a caliph by Sunni and Shia Muslims. Sunnis believe a caliph should be elected and Shia believe a caliph should be an Imam chosen from the “Family of the House”, whom are believed to be the direct descendants of Muhammad. Both believe the Caliph is a prophet. The divide over the proper successor to the Prophet Muhammad as caliph in 632 is what sparked the schism between Shiites and Sunnis. ISIS is a Sunni extremist group that wants to establish a Salafist caliphate  throughout the region.

Who are the Salafists?

The Salafi movement is a sect within Islam with very strict religious views. Salafists adhere  to an orthodox form of Sunni Islam (specifically Wahabism) adhering to literal and traditional readings of the Koran and Sharia law. ISIS, along with other Salafists, believes in returning to the the early teachings of Islam and rejecting later interpretations. Salafism  came about in the 19th century to reject influences on the religion from the Western world, even rejecting previous caliphates such as the Ottoman Caliphate.

ISIS, which follows an extreme jihadist version of Salafism (and which many Salafists reject), wants to purify Muslim society, whether through eliminating  rival  groups they believe are counter to their mission (e.g. Hamas or Al-Qaida) or through violence against  Shia Muslims and other groups. Once ISIS takes control of an area, they declare that everyone must follow their interpretation of Sunni Islam and Sharia law under penalty of death or torture. Many times this has resulted in honor killings and other horrific violence against women. Former British Foreign Minister, William Hague stated in June:

“Anyone glorifying, supporting or joining [ISIS] should understand that they would be assisting a group responsible for kidnapping, torture, executions, rape and many other hideous crimes.”

Wasn’t the US fighting Al-Qaida, in Iraq?

Now this is where things get a little confusing. ISIS was Al-Qaida in Iraq, in a previous iteration. Originally called Jama’at al-Tawhid wal-Jihad, the organization now called ISIS was established in 1999 and later played a key role in the jihadist movement against coalition forces during the Iraqi Insurgency. The name evolved unofficially to Al-Qaida in Iraq, or AQI, after the group pledged allegiance to Osama Bin Laden and Al-Qaida in 2004. After a failed attempt to unify insurgents in 2006, leader Abu Omar al-Baghdadi established the Islamic State of Iraq, or ISI, which has since become ISIS. However, ISIS is  no longer affiliated with Al-Qaida. Their relationship may have been built on mutual interests, but the two groups varied in their ideologies. More recently, ISIS’s involvement in the Syrian Civil War, resulting in ISIS taking control of Al-Qaida’s designated Syrian faction, caused Al-Qaida to sever ties completely. Al-Qaida’s General Command released a statement in February disavowing their former affiliate,

“ISIS is not a branch of [Al-Qaida], we have no organizational relationship with it, and the group is not responsible for its actions.”

Following the split, Al-Qaida’s presence in Iraq is scant,and their presence in Syria is also dwindling, making ISIS one of the major threats in the region.
140617171808-cnnx-isis-control-iraq-lead-tablet-large

Why did the US pull out of Iraq if ISIS was such a problem?

Back in 2011, the US State Department started to view ISIS as a waning threat to the region. Before the withdrawal of US troops ISIS had been nearly eliminated in Iraq. The group gained strength following the removal of coalition forces in 2011, and recruitment increased significantly the following year. By 2014, their involvement in Iraq and the Syrian Civil War gave ISIS a significant presence in the region. Some argue their increase in recruitment numbers was due to discontent among Sunni militia and civilians, stemming from mistreatment by Iraqi President Nouri al-Maliki, a Shiite. The Economist claims ISIS is less like a terrorist group and more like an army.

“It has aimed to control territory, dispensing its own brand of justice and imposing its own moral code: no smoking, football, music, or unveiled women, for example. And it imposes taxes in the parts of Syria and Iraq it has conquered.”

So where does the US go from here? President Obama announced the other night, “America will lead a broad coalition to roll back this terrorist threat. Our objective is clear: We will degrade, and ultimately destroy, ISIL through a comprehensive and sustained counterterrorism strategy.” The real question is can the response by the United States fix the political turmoil of a region trapped between dictators and terrorists?